Female subjectivity from a Feminine Authorial Perspective

Addressing the representation problematic of the female voice of the Third World, critic G.C. Spivak is concerned whether the female as a subaltern/marginalized can speak within the structure of literature and history. Influenced by social and ideological constructions that are dominated by the perspective of the male, and homogenized by French feminists who are unaware of Third World Women real struggles within their own historical, political and cultural universe, the genuine voice of Third World women is absent, as asserted by Spivak. She argues that the inability of the female of the Third World to speak her own (hi)story lies, fundamentally, in ventriloquizing her voice by projecting the speaker’s ideas. This leads to omitting the real (hi)story of the Third World woman, thus silencing her.

Spivak continues and sets two conditions for the women to be having a voice: when women speak to correct falsified and politically imposed version of their history, and while speaking they are heard. The rigid dichotomy between speech and silence as presented by Spivak’s theory of the subaltern poses a challenge to every reading of a female character in literature. The theory seems to foreclose the possibility of a space in which the female subaltern can have a voice of her own. Examining the possibility of reading female characters as vital characters in their plots instead of dooming them to silence from the very beginning, the research extends a middle ground between the binary opposites (silence and speech). By identifying two forms of speech—the literal and the metaphorical—, this study aims at enabling us to understand the main female characters in novels by female authors of the Third World. Literal speech is found in the dialogues with other characters, as well as their interior and exterior monologues. Metaphorical speech includes performances or actions based on pers